Medical Malpractice Defense
          Special Situations
Home Contents Forum Links - Courses Contact About Join, Free
Medicine and Justice 
 
Dr & Patient Relationship
 
Prevention
 
Warning
Summons
Trial
Aftermath
 
License
Insurance
  
Counter - Measures
Reform
 
Stat! Help
 
Teach Us  
FAQ
 
 
  1. Multiple Suits
    The key issues to consider are first, whether these occur in the same or overlapping policy years, as this could raise the possibility of exceeding your aggregate. You will need to examine your policy, but a typical coverage is $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 aggregate.
    If the policy limits are exceeded, then your umbrella policy, if you have one, comes into play. Check on it, too. These can be handled separately from the main policy, by a different agency and institution. Be sure you see written confirmation it is in effect. There are also often notification rules for these policies that are separate from the main policy, so be sure to follow them.
    Another issue with multiple suits is to be sure not to say something in one deposition or testimony that appears to confuse or contradict another. So think out whatever you say with all cases in mind. These usually come from a trigger such as a very hostile and talkative patient, a visible fight with the institution, a visible illness, a conflict with another physician. Avoid these carefully.
  2. Punitive Damages
    This is a type of extra financial penalty for "wanton" or similar action, which is not very often awarded. But if it comes up, most policies do not cover it. So it is very important to be aware of it ahead of time. It may well be grounds for appeal, but it is better if you don't have to deal with it. Careful planning of your case to avoid loose ends or extra vulnerabilities will lessen the risk of this appearing. Again, this is not covered by insurance policies. Work to show continued concern, contact, careful followup on tests, the presence of all potentially indicated tests, and consultation in the chart with authorities in the area.
  3. Conflicts between Defendants
    This is a classic situation with dueling defendants which usually makes life easier for the plaintiff, and helps the plaintiff’s attorney. It puts disagreements into the open. All defendants would be well advised to work out differences in some other way. The insurance company usually recognizes this problem and may work to avoid it, or bring the parties together. Curiously they may not try to improve the situation. Keep your eye on the higher goal of not losing a suit.
  4. Crossed Agendas
    If there are different types of coverage, such as an institution and a physician, at risk, it can lead to different levels and types of exposure for the insurer. Be cautious that you understand this, and look out for problems it can create. It may motivate the parties behind the scenes in ways you need to understand. Consider and investigate what may happen below closed insurance doors.